All reagents were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO,
USA) unless otherwise indicated. Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells
were grown for 2-3 days in >>>>-MEM and 10% (v/v) calf serum
(Intergen Co., Purchase, NY, USA) on 19 mm cover slips coated with
0.1% (w/v) type I collagen in 0.1 M acetic acid. They were then
fixed for 10 min with 2% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS: 140 mM NaCl, 2.6 mM KCl, 8.1 mM Na>>>>2HPO>>>>4, 1.5 mM
KH>>>>2PO>>>>4, 0.9 mM CaCl>>>>2, 0.5 mM MgCl>>>>2, pH 7.4), permeabilized
for 10 min with 0.1% saponin in cytoskeletal stabilization buffer
(CSB: 137 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1.1 mM Na>>>>2HPO>>>>4, 0.4 mM
KH>>>>2PO>>>>4, 4 mM NaHCO>>>>3, 2 mM MgCl>>>>2, 2 mM EGTA, 5 mM Pipes,
0.1% glucose, pH 6.1) and incubated for 60 min with a primary
antibody. After 3 washes of 5 min each in CSB, the cells were
incubated for 45 min with 12.5 >>>>
g/ml of a Cy5-conjugated secondary
antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA, USA) and 50
>>>>
g/ml Hoechst 33258 (Molecular Probes, Inc., Eugene, OR USA). The
coverslips were washed three more times in CSB before mounting on
microscope slides using gelvatol (60 ml of 10 mM Tris, 15 g Airvol 205
(Air Products, Allentown, PA, USA), 30 ml glycerol, 1 g n-propyl
gallate). Images of Cy5 and Hoechst 33258 fluorescence were acquired
separately using a Zeiss Plan-Neofluar objective (100x, 1.3 NA), and a
Photometrics CH 250 cooled charge-coupled device (512 x 382 23
>>>>
m square pixels) mounted on a customized Zeiss Axiovert microscope
[22].
>>>>
Monoclonal antibodies directed against the Golgi protein giantin [23], the lysosomal protein LAMP2 [24], the yeast nucleolar protein NOP4 [25], and tubulin (Sigma) were used as primary antibodies in separate labeling experiments. Working dilutions of antibody stock solutions were obtained by empirically optimizing for low background in the presence of adequate specific signal. >>>>
Each slide was scanned for single cells that were spread out on the
coverslip (i.e., not rounded up in mitosis). Each such field of view
was acquired as a stack of three images in which the focus was changed
by 0.237 >>>>m between each slice. Combined with the 100x objective
and 23>>>>
m pixels in the CCD, this slice separation results in
nearly cubic 0.23>>>>
m voxels at the object. The image collection is
available at http://murphylab.web.cmu.edu/data/, and the
number of images per class is included in Table 2.1.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>